In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:33:11 -0800: Hi, [snip] >The Rossi claim may not be similar to the new Mills' CIHT device, but it is >similar to an old Mills' device - the one known as the "reverse gyrotron".
That's true, but I think Mark was referring to Mills' latest work, given that he used the present tense of the verb "to seem". Hence my reply. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] > >In reply to MarkI-ZeroPoint's message: >Hi, > >>So has Rossi also stumbled upon what caused BLP to change their course of >development, i.e., direct conversion to electricity? >> >>This may serve as an independent replication of a discovery of a direct >conversion phenomenon if both companies were going down one path >(conversion-to-heat) and then discovered a more direct path to electricity. >BLP seems to have abandoned the direct-to-heat (d2h) path in favor of >direct-to-electricity (d2e), while Rossi is continuing the d2h path to get >something to market and cash-flow as soon as possible... perhaps a better >strategy than BLP. >> >>Only other question is what kind of electrical current (and thus, power) is >being produced... >> >>-Mark Iverson > >I don't think the two processes are similar. Mills is using a chemical >approach >AFAIK, i.e. his device is similar to a fuel cell wherein however the energy >comes from Hydrino production. What Rossi appears to be talking about is >direct >conversion of particle energy to EMF (cyclotron frequency?) in a magnetic >field. > >Presumably he would then allow the EMF to resonate in a chamber/antenna >converting it to a high frequency AC current which could then be rectified >to >DC. > >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > > Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
