He is lying about stability. One of the tests showed COP of 3, the other almost 6. Some of them do not work, others melt. And this is not the reactor itself, it is that he doesn't know how to do the fuel properly.
It means he cannot issue a patent because not even in practice, he can claim to know what exactly needs to be done to get a reliable device. 2013/5/22 Andrew <[email protected]> > ** > How so? In recent interviews he's touted the great stability of the 360 > deg C design (intended to interface with the Siemens thermoelectric gear). > Also, he's got these purported 1 MW units composed of over 100 devices. > According to him they are built, tested and delivered. According to one > source (I forget, sorry, I read a lot today) nothing has been delivered > anywhere. If they're real, then he knows how to build the devices, by his > own admission. > > Andrew > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> > *To:* John Milstone <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 22, 2013 5:33 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]: The marketing model > > Maybe that's because that he doesn't know how to make the device reliably? > > > 2013/5/22 Andrew <[email protected]> > >> ** >> Does anyone feel that the sales and marketing model for this technology >> is a little odd? Why would one not immediately try and flood the market >> with these devices? Rossi has a head start on the competition, and there's >> no reason why he cannot maintain his lead even after they torn it apart and >> reverse-engineered it. >> >> Andrew >> > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > [email protected] > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ [email protected]
