Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: I believe you are underestimating the value of a small and efficient LENR > device. >
The commercial value would be great. However, it is difficult to believe results on a such a small scale. If the scale has now increased from 20 to 50 mW up to about 100 mW -- as claimed -- that makes it easier to believe. What we need now is independent confirmation. The Nanor device is significantly different from other cold fusion devices, so it needs more independent confirmation than these others. If it were yet another bulk Pd device, or yet another gas loaded nanoparticle device, it would less of a burden to meet. It does not get a free pass. Independent confirmation is essential. Replication would be even better. Until it is confirmed, we have to take a 'wait and see' approach. - Jed
