We observe two moving electrons in my calculation.  The first one generates a 
magnetic field that the second one is exposed to.  The electrons do not see 
this effect in their world view.  This is equivalent to what we might see if we 
look at two parallel beams of charged particles.   Speed them up to nearly the 
speed of light and my calculation is that they do not attract or repel each 
other.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: H Veeder <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Feb 16, 2014 11:41 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Velocity dependent model of Coulomb's law


What is the source of the magnetism?


Harry




On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 6:24 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

Sorry, I realize that my wording was flawed.  I mean that the two particles are 
moving in parallel at the same velocity.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: H Veeder <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Feb 16, 2014 3:20 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Velocity dependent model of Coulomb's law







On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 9:44 AM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote:

Once I made a calculation of the attraction between two charged particles that 
are moving together at a constant velocity relative to my frame of reference.  
I was pleasantly surprised to find that as the velocity of the two charges 
approached the speed of light, a perfect balance between the electric force and 
the magnetic force was achieved.  This implied that there would be precisely 
zero electromagnetic force between the two and hence no acceleration either 
together or apart at the speed of light.  This matches the special theory of 
relativity since at light speed the time dilation reaches infinity for the 
objects being viewed.

Since their time was slowed down to zero, they should not be seen as 
accelerating towards or away from each other.

Dave

 








Dave, what do you mean by "moving together"? Moving on parallel paths at 
constant velocity or moving off in different directions  at constant velocity?







Harry






Reply via email to