Axil, I am in total agreement with your first 5 paragraphs and I agree with 
where you are going but disagree that magnetism will increase or decrease 
particle production... even used in conjunction with nano geometry which 
restricts larger virtual particles in a casimir like manner the magnetism is 
only segregating the virtual particles between regions of various suppression.. 
I can see this providing a spatial bias to virtual particles that would 
unbalance the  normal cancelation of random uncertainty.. perhaps a self 
assembled maxwellian demon of sorts. Would like to see if you can still put 
your theory forward without relying on a breach of the isotropy or at least 
stipulating that the breach is a function of the geometry which your magnetism 
is leveraging somehow.
Regards
Fran

From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:04 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Progress to date


The following post is a synthesis of a number of individual and disjointed 
posts that I have produced in recent months to make sense of a complicated 
issue. That issue is the confusion incipient in the vast differences and 
contradictions seen in a wide variety of LENR systems.

>From system to system, LENR is subject to a variation of strength. To my way 
>of thinking, this variability in the characterization of the unique mix and 
>match LENR processes instantiated in each LENR system are directly based on 
>the strengths of magnetic fields inherent in each LENR system.

Magnetic fields interact with the vacuum and produce a number of different 
breakdown mechanisms as a function of that field's strength.

To start this detailing, virtual particle production in the vacuum is one of 
the sources of the uncertainty in quantum mechanics as particles come randomly 
into and out of existence. Tunneling and radioactivity is a result of this 
vacuum based uncertainty.

Magnetic fields interact with the vacuum to produce particles in a 
deterministic way. As the strength of the magnetic fields increase, the 
probability that the vacuum will generate particles will also increase. This 
increase particle production in the vacuum increases the rates of tunneling and 
radioactivity.

As the magnetic field gains strength to intermediate levels, the vacuum 
produces composite particles from fermions. The magnetic field interacts with 
the various types of fermions to catalyze virtual charge carrying 
quasi-particle pairs that are bound to the fermions as the fermions attempts to 
minimize its particular energy level.

As the magnetic field reaches it maximum strength, this field produces mesons 
out of the vacuum which effectively guaranties nuclear disruption in terms of 
charge screening, cluster fusion, fission, and isotope and radioactivity 
stabilization

In summary, a single primary magnetic field based causation produces strength 
based mix and match results centered on a hierarchy of magnetically catalyzed 
vacuum based particle production mechanisms.

Reply via email to