The set of mechanisms whereby the magnetic field interacts with the vacuum and the nucleus is many faceted, complex, obscure, uncorrelated and hard to understand.
For example, results from the Large Hadron Collider show asymmetries because of magnetic effects: CP violations. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation Heavy ion collisions show magnetic effects during the formation of the quark-gluon plasma http://arxiv.org/pdf/1312.3348.pdf The Chiral Magnetic Effect and Anomaly-Induced Transport *Abstract* *The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) is the phenomenon of electric charge separation along the external magnetic eld that is induced by the chirality imbalance. The CME is a macroscopic quantum effect - it is a manifestation of the chiral anomaly creating a collective motion in Dirac sea. Because the chirality imbalance is related to the global topology of gauge fields, the CME current is topologically protected and hence non-dissipative even in the presence of strong interactions. As a result, the CME and related quantum phenomena affect the hydrodynamical and transport behavior of systems possessing chiral fermions, from the quark-gluon plasma to chiral materials.* *The goal of the present review is to provide an elementary introduction into the main ideas underlying the physics of CME, a historical perspective, and a guide to the rapidly growing literature on this topic.* There is a lot of work being done by astrophysicists in the area of nuclear reactions on the surface of neutron stars and black holes involving high magnetic fields. There seems to be a threshold value of 10^16 Tesla involved for vacuum breakdown where the most intense magnetic effects take hold. Let’s now attempt to put on a more comprehensible face onto the size of that huge number as follows: 1,000,000,000,000,000 tesla. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Fran and Axil-- > > Don’t forget the Chiral effect > http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf a quote > from the previous link: > > “In strong magnetic field quarks and antiquarks pair more effectively! > S.P. Klevansky and R. H. Lemmer ('89); H. Suganuma and T. Tatsumi ('91) - > effective models > V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy ('94, '95, '96,...) → > real QCDxQED > Enhancement of the chiral symmetry breaking at strong B > 1) Dimensional reduction (3+1)D → (1+1)D: In a very strong > magnetic field the dynamics of electrically charged particles (quarks, > in our case) becomes effectively one-dimensional, because the > particles tend to move along the magnetic field only. > > 2) Quarks interact stronger in one spatial dimension: In (1+1)D an > arbitrarily weakest interaction between two objects leads to pair > formation. This fact: (i) follows from Quantum Mechanics; (ii) is > known as a “Cooper theorem” in solid state physics.” > > and the Lamb effect. The Chirl Effect depends on the dimensions acting > --1, vs 2, vs 3, vs 4, vs 5 etc. > > Bob > > *From:* Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 26, 2014 1:06 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Progress to date > > > Axil, I am in total agreement with your first 5 paragraphs and I agree > with where you are going but disagree that magnetism will increase or > decrease particle production… even used in conjunction with nano geometry > which restricts larger virtual particles in a casimir like manner the > magnetism is only segregating the virtual particles between regions of > various suppression.. I can see this providing a spatial bias to virtual > particles that would unbalance the normal cancelation of random > uncertainty.. perhaps a self assembled maxwellian demon of sorts. Would > like to see if you can still put your theory forward without relying on a > breach of the isotropy or at least stipulating that the breach is a > function of the geometry which your magnetism is leveraging somehow. > > Regards > > Fran > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:04 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Progress to date > > > > The following post is a synthesis of a number of individual and disjointed > posts that I have produced in recent months to make sense of a complicated > issue. That issue is the confusion incipient in the vast differences and > contradictions seen in a wide variety of LENR systems. > > > From system to system, LENR is subject to a variation of strength. To my > way of thinking, this variability in the characterization of the unique mix > and match LENR processes instantiated in each LENR system are directly > based on the strengths of magnetic fields inherent in each LENR system. > > Magnetic fields interact with the vacuum and produce a number of different > breakdown mechanisms as a function of that field’s strength. > > To start this detailing, virtual particle production in the vacuum is one > of the sources of the uncertainty in quantum mechanics as particles come > randomly into and out of existence. Tunneling and radioactivity is a result > of this vacuum based uncertainty. > > Magnetic fields interact with the vacuum to produce particles in a > deterministic way. As the strength of the magnetic fields increase, the > probability that the vacuum will generate particles will also increase. > This increase particle production in the vacuum increases the rates of > tunneling and radioactivity. > > > As the magnetic field gains strength to intermediate levels, the vacuum > produces composite particles from fermions. The magnetic field interacts > with the various types of fermions to catalyze virtual charge carrying > quasi-particle pairs that are bound to the fermions as the fermions > attempts to minimize its particular energy level. > > As the magnetic field reaches it maximum strength, this field produces > mesons out of the vacuum which effectively guaranties nuclear disruption in > terms of charge screening, cluster fusion, fission, and isotope and > radioactivity stabilization > > > In summary, a single primary magnetic field based causation produces > strength based mix and match results centered on a hierarchy of > magnetically catalyzed vacuum based particle production mechanisms. >
