-----Original Message----- From: Edmund Storms > Once again Jones, you make the discussion personal by arrogant descriptions of what you think I believe.
>From my perspective, arrogance was not intended- and if seen, then it must have been a result of mirroring of the initial comment, which as you may recall began with an what can be called a rather arrogant belittlement of a proposed experiment that does not fit into someone's own pet theory. > My description does not involve a theory, at least not at this stage. LOL. Sure fooled me. Jones
