Let me say this again as simply and as unambiguously as possible. LENR has been studied for 24 years. Hundreds of papers describing the behavior and the required conditions have been published. This data set shows what is required and what does not work. My comments are not a theory. I'm simply describing what has been discovered. Based on reading this experience, I can say with absolute certainty that LENR requires a special condition to form in a material before it can be initiated. What that special condition is can be called a theory but that a special condition is required is not a theory.
No study will be successful or useful unless that special condition forms. That condition forms by chance on some occasions. Anyone attempting to study LENR needs to discover how to make this change occur. If the field is to advance, people need to focus on this problem. Simply testing a variety of materials is useful but it is a poor way to find what works. I'm suggesting that people actually be guided by what has been done, not try any crazy idea that might be suggested. Yes, I know you do not believe the NAE exists, Jones. You believe the treatment is the important variable, not the material itself. That is fair, but please keep the discussion focused on this difference of opinion and not wonder into what else you think I believe or not. Ed Storms On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:15 AM, Jones Beene wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Edmund Storms > >> Once again Jones, you make the discussion personal by arrogant > descriptions of what you think I believe. > > From my perspective, arrogance was not intended- and if seen, then it must > have been a result of mirroring of the initial comment, which as you may > recall began with an what can be called a rather arrogant belittlement of a > proposed experiment that does not fit into someone's own pet theory. > >> My description does not involve a theory, at least not at this stage. > > LOL. Sure fooled me. > > Jones > > > >
