Bob, I agree that he could consider doing exactly what you describe and perhaps one day that will happen. My response was due to what I read on his blog when he was answering a question from one of his audience. Unless I misunderstood him, he appeared to use the term jet engine as a replacement for turbine. Of course a jet engine is often built with turbine compressors, etc.
Do you read his journal? I have found that it contains useful information on occasions. Recently, the good tidbits of knowledge have been limited as compared to before his company was purchased this year. I suspect they have placed a chain around his neck to prevent helping competitors. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Bob Cook <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Mar 24, 2014 12:30 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation Dave-- I assumed Rossi was refering to a LENR reactor that preheated the normal fuel of a jet engine, similar to what NASA engineers were saying was being considere by someone and similar to the design of the 1950's GE design of their J-47 jet engine/nuclear reactor. Depending upon how much energy is added to the fuel, more or less fuel is required for combustion to get the reaction started and the engine running. Given enough tubro compression of incoming air, the fuel usage may decrease to very little or none under normal conditions of operation and energy release from the LENR reaction. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: David Roberson To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 8:33 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation I interpret Rossi's discussion of the jet engine as referring to a turbine generator and not an actual aviation application. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, Mar 24, 2014 12:33 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation From: Axil DGT is also a validation of Rossi, don't you think? Possibly, but no one knows. They have presented interesting claims, especially the magnetic claim - but the scientific data is basically limited to one joint paper in which Kim says he did not actually validate the data. Shortly after this IE interview, everything seemed to fall apart for them financially. http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/ManningIE110.pdf They have no patent, no replications, dwindling support among experts and no respected scientist to speak for them without Kim – who seems to be less than enthusiastic these days. They were a no-show at MIT. The web site is pitiable. Their presence in Canada is reportedly reduced to an answering machine and shared office with no full time staff. Essentially they seem to be broke. Worst of all - the main feature of their reactor – the electrical discharge into hydrogen loaded powder - is covered in Ahern’s prior patent application. Their main claim to fame may be having “borrowed” Rossi’s secret recipe, but the bottom line seems to be lack of funds, probably stemming from a crazy business plan based on extraordinarily high up-front fees. No one signed up, apparently. Don’t hold your breath until they deliver. It’s too bad, since they probably have seen gain. Perhaps they can snatch victory for the jaws of defeat. If they can just demonstrate the incredible magnetic field to a potential investor, that would seem to be enough. It could have other uses. Note – Rossi has been focusing on jet engine substitution recently- and the DGT design could be better suited for that.
