Bob,

Apparently you are correct about the jet engine effort.  I just read the latest 
journal entries by Mr. Rossi and must admit that his words suggest what you 
believe.  Earlier I read posts which seemed to imply what I understood.

It seems odd that they would work toward enhancing a jet engine instead of 
producing the power plant directly.  Why carry the jet fuel along if you can 
make sufficient power to keep the air craft in the sky for an indefinite amount 
of time using LENR?  Do you see an advantage to their approach?

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Cook <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Mar 24, 2014 10:39 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation



Dave--
 
I read his log about 2x per week.  Over the years I have found Rossi to be 
sincere and honest. 
 
I suspect he has been in contact with Boeing and the jet engine manufacturers. 
 
I hope it comes to pass with his Hot Cat. 
 
Bob
  
----- Original Message ----- 
  
From:   David   Roberson 
  
To: [email protected] 
  
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 3:09 PM
  
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno   presentation
  


  
Bob, I agree that he could consider doing exactly what you describe and   
perhaps one day that will happen.  My response was due to what I read on   his 
blog when he was answering a question from one of his audience.    Unless I 
misunderstood him, he appeared to use the term jet engine as a   replacement 
for turbine.  Of course a jet engine is often built with   turbine compressors, 
etc.
  
 
  
Do you read his journal?  I have found that it contains useful   information on 
occasions.  Recently, the good tidbits of knowledge have   been limited as 
compared to before his company was purchased this year.    I suspect they have 
placed a chain around his neck to prevent helping   competitors.
  
 
  
Dave
  
  
  
-----Original   Message-----
From: Bob Cook <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l   <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Mar 24, 2014 12:30 pm
Subject:   Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation

  
  
  
Dave--
  
 
  
I assumed Rossi was refering to a LENR reactor   that preheated the normal fuel 
of a jet engine, similar to what NASA engineers   were saying was being 
considere by someone and similar to the design   of the 1950's GE design of 
their J-47 jet engine/nuclear reactor.    Depending upon how much energy is 
added to the fuel, more or less fuel is   required for combustion to get the 
reaction started and the engine   running.  Given enough tubro compression of 
incoming air, the fuel usage   may decrease to very little or none under normal 
conditions of operation and   energy release from the LENR reaction.   
  
 
  
Bob  
  
    
-----     Original Message ----- 
    
From:     David     Roberson 
    
To:     [email protected] 
    
Sent:     Monday, March 24, 2014 8:33 AM
    
Subject:     Re: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno presentation
    


    
I interpret Rossi's discussion     of the jet engine as referring to a turbine 
generator and not an actual     aviation application.
    
 
    
Dave
    
    
    
-----Original     Message-----
From: Jones Beene <[email protected]>
To:     vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon,     Mar 24, 2014 12:33 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:More on the Mizuno     presentation

    
        
    
    
From: Axil     
    
 
    
    
DGT is also a     validation of Rossi, don't you think?
    
    
 
    
Possibly, but no one knows. They have     presented interesting claims, 
especially the magnetic claim - but the     scientific data is basically 
limited to one joint paper in which Kim says he     did not actually validate 
the data. Shortly after this IE interview,     everything seemed to fall apart 
for them financially.
    
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/ManningIE110.pdf
    
 
    
They have no patent, no replications,     dwindling support among experts and 
no respected scientist to speak for them     without Kim – who seems to be less 
than enthusiastic these days. They were a     no-show at MIT. The web site is 
pitiable. Their presence in Canada is     reportedly reduced to an answering 
machine and shared office with no full     time staff. Essentially they seem to 
be broke. 
    
 
    
Worst of all - the main feature of     their reactor – the electrical discharge 
into hydrogen loaded powder - is     covered in Ahern’s prior patent 
application. Their main claim to fame may be     having “borrowed” Rossi’s 
secret recipe, but the bottom line seems to be     lack of funds, probably 
stemming from a crazy business plan based on     extraordinarily high up-front 
fees. No one signed up,     apparently.
    
 
    
Don’t hold your breath until they     deliver. It’s too bad, since they 
probably have seen gain.     
    
 
    
Perhaps they can snatch victory for     the jaws of defeat. If they can just 
demonstrate the incredible magnetic     field to a potential investor, that 
would seem to be enough. It could have     other uses. Note – Rossi has been 
focusing on jet engine substitution     recently- and the DGT design could be 
better suited for     that.
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
 
    
 






Reply via email to