Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: This is really funny seeing people calling DGT presentation amateur while > being completely oblivious to the complete incompetence of Rossi's > presentation! >
No one I know has said Rossi does good presentations. The two are unrelated. The fact that Rossi does bad presentation does not excuse bad presentations by DGT. Also, Rossi has never agreed to come to a conference, whereas the DGT people have come to them, and made video presentations. These presentations raised more questions than they answered. DGT agreed to come to the recent MIT symposium but they cancelled at the last minute, which is unprofessional. It's so full of holes that we can hardly exclude cheating from any of them. > I disagree. I think that some of Rossi's tests were solid. I see no holes in the ELFORSK tests. No skeptic has published a credible critique of the ELFORSK test as far as I know. The only critiques I have seen are so bad they show that the skeptics do not have a leg to stand on. > For me, at least DGT, this is mostly bad mouth by Jed, due his naivete in > dealing with business. > I have been accused of many things, but naivete is not among them. The business model described here by Axil Axil is that companies such as General Electric or Boeing have succeeded by filching small sums of money from contractors. That is not true. I have dealt with these companies and I am sure they pay their bills. I am quite sure Boeing would not be a profitable major corporation if their main source of revenue was to steal $1,400 at a time from people like me. - Jed
