Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:
Good, More details. They say that the devil is in the details.
>
> It could be that DGT failed to honor their offer to refund your costs as
> being due to your negative proclamations about their technical and
> financial stability of their company.
>
No, it couldn't be. I said NOTHING about them for about a year after they
promised to pay. I said nothing even thought it was clear to me they were
not going to pay. I figured it was unimportant. As I said here after about
a year, small start up companies are often broke, so no big deal.
Furthermore, as I have pointed out several times, they publicly promised to
pay. Right here they did. Why would they do that if they were upset with
me? That makes no sense. They would disavow the debt.
Again you are speculating about something you know nothing about. You are
making unfounded statements, and you are ignoring statements made by the
people from Defkalion here and elsewhere.
> They say that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar. Such
> negative feelings of humiliation and rejection are human and natural.
>
That's absurd. Do you think I feel humiliated and rejected because some
clown owes me a grand?!? Lots of people owe me money. I learned 40 years
ago to cut 'em off and forget about them. It doesn't matter.
> Furthermore, if your business strategy is to front expenses to maintain
> the appearance of impartiality and independence . . .
>
This is not a business strategy. I am not engaged in business here.
> After all, you made the business mistake of not protecting yourself by
> buying a non refundable ticket.
>
The non-refundable ones are cheaper. Heck, this one would have been a lot
cheaper if they hadn't cancelled and rescheduled so many times. The
original ticket was something like $800 as I recall. If they had cancelled
completely the first time I would have eaten the $800 and never said a word
about it.
("Eaten" in American business jargon means "I would have written off the
expense.")
- Jed
