Daniel - I basically believe in the positive side of man kind. Any false information will do no good. Just the opposite. I am aware that there is evil people but they have no room to play if information is forthcoming in a complete and accurate form.
Axil - Yes there is military stands all the time. Almost all the wars has been fought because of getting control of natural resources. I do not see LENR being so easy a target. It has no borders. Other issues: 1. Russia was my neighbor for 45 years and has been considered an enemy for centuries in Scandinavia. They have cycles all built on isolationism. Historically US is also is an isolated nation. I see no merit in trying to proof who has the biggest one. However, I am sure some military or politician has that ambition but I think the US population is tired of US intervention abroad to no gain. 2. Russia wants to sell gas to all of Eurasia - of course. Why do we worry about that. It is hardly a good set up to try to compete with shipped gas versus pipelined. 3. We have no idea when a LENR solution is going to be available. I think 10 to 15 years is a fair estimate, if the speed of development will increase as we have a viable (Rossi) process. Many things will happen in the political world. How will China's new power structure pan out? and many other things not related to LENR.. 4. I was not aware of the super weapon but I assume it will be available to more nations than the US and then we can start negotiate disarmament and limitations of number of weapons again. Probably going to be harder this time. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > *There is a war underway: an energy war in which the US is trying to > turn Russia away from its ambitions of renewed empire. * > > > > *Russia wants to sell gas to China to protect against American LPG imports > to Europe. That is a 100 billion dollar deal over 30 years.* > > > > *What happens when all that gas has no market in China? Does China still > take the gas? What happens to Putin and his designs to change the borders > in Eastern Europe when his economy is in ruins? * > > > > *What will Putin do to counter the new super weapon of mass energy > disruption? We will know the answers to all this is a year or two.* > > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: > >> False rumors help dispels that threat, given that it is a highly >> stigmatized field. I think that, with an invention of this proportion, the >> greed, no, the ambition, can make anyone with a huge stick in power break >> up any law. >> >> >> 2014-05-15 14:10 GMT-03:00 Lennart Thornros <[email protected]>: >> >>> [image: Boxbe] <https://www.boxbe.com/overview> This message is >>> eligible for Automatic Cleanup! ([email protected]) Add cleanup >>> rule<https://www.boxbe.com/popup?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxbe.com%2Fcleanup%3Ftoken%3DfCECqxFICkrh2BuLKDUi%252BoiMO6H9HD8udu2s5nu%252B1RoaNy%252BG6zMAaOiQZht9mv%252FrsSm5%252Ff0OKywqGkqUdHoCJFTZxiWW0Pk3VjBbsJzxnjJjpfjh2jzccjmt1l0D%252BkaiWy0vp2kRTWs%253D%26key%3DwIKr1vcVL1jhEhIP%252FAujgz0rqiCuJAnlOFSWkGpim6o%253D&tc_serial=17261231971&tc_rand=528933168&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001>| >>> More >>> info<http://blog.boxbe.com/general/boxbe-automatic-cleanup?tc_serial=17261231971&tc_rand=528933168&utm_source=stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001> >>> >>> I agree with you Daniel - it is a paradigm shift. However, if it is not >>> communicated it is nothing. I think I said that there is a time to give >>> info until then being silent is an option if you can reach the goal by >>> yourself. Most people need help (mostly financial but even technical) and >>> it is therefore required to communicate and inform. The communication needs >>> to be following rules set up by the culture / society. >>> >>> The problem just now, in my opinion, is that there are indications about >>> at least one viable solution. As it is such a great thing if mastered there >>> should be resources set aside to keep the all important information flow >>> going without interruption. >>> >>> Your military scare is just as I mentioned before. Lack of information >>> means a lot of rumors. I btw do not think the military can / will do >>> anything as it is not feasible for a number of reasons. Already spread >>> information is one and the fact that this an international community. Just >>> cut the military out if they don't want to invest:) >>> >>> Best Regards , >>> Lennart Thornros >>> >>> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com >>> [email protected] >>> +1 916 436 1899 >>> 6140 Horseshoe Bar Road Suite G, Loomis CA 95650 >>> >>> “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a >>> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Daniel Rocha <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Lennart, >>>> >>>> High powered Cold Fusion is unlike any invention in the recorded >>>> history of mankind. It is a paradigm shift of the greatest degree. Keeping >>>> it a secret is not unreasonable. It would not be strange that in the event >>>> this is proven true, military force may be used to acquire the technology. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-05-15 13:40 GMT-03:00 Lennart Thornros <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Axil, I think your conclusion is too simple. I will give you an example >>>>> from my life. >>>>> >>>>> As a young business man it happened that I was interviewed by local >>>>> newspapers. After a few interviews I was very disappointed and concluded; >>>>> "To hell with the media they misunderstand everything". A few years later >>>>> I >>>>> had a corporate job and media was part of the job. A part I hated. >>>>> However, >>>>> after some time I had better luck and the outcome was more to my liking. >>>>> (I >>>>> am not saying I am good at it but I am better than when I was young:). >>>>> >>>>> What is the to find from that? That media has learnt to understand me? >>>>> Nae, the other way around of course - I had figured out how to express >>>>> myself better and in a way that I left very little room for >>>>> interpretation. >>>>> I think that we have the same issue with LENR demos. It is part of the >>>>> 'job' to provide info and proof. It has to be done with integrity and >>>>> without unclear assumptions/predictions. >>>>> I also agree that if one cannot do the demos in a controlled way it is >>>>> better to not do them. If not informing, there will, however, not be any >>>>> recognition and in the long run the result is worth nothing. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards , >>>>> Lennart Thornros >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> [email protected] >> > >
