Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote:

I seriously doubt that Peer Review of the Rossi reactor can be done, It is
> a waste of time.
> First of all, Rossi has no peers.
>
> Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people of similar
> competence to the producers of the work (peers). Rossi has made sure that
> only he can produce the results of his reactor.
>

That is a good point.

I was referring to a peer-review of the tests sponsored by ELFORSK, which
is somewhat different from a review of Rossi's own work. However, I agree
it is related, and it would be difficult to peer-review. Also, a journal
such as *Nature* would never allow a report of a black-box test such as
this.

- Jed

Reply via email to