I was referring to a peer-review of the tests sponsored by ELFORSK, which
is somewhat different from a review of Rossi's own work. However, I agree
it is related, and it would be difficult to peer-review. Also, a journal
such as *Nature* would never allow a report of a black-box test such as
this.
***Jed, earlier you said that submitting a peer reviewable report was a
fool's errand.  Do you think these dilly-dallying professors have engaged
in such a fool's errand?

Reply via email to