This type of spot welder is likely to deliver something in the range of 50-300 joules, without any means of controlling it (but measurable). Mills only claims that he "should" be able to detonate his wet particles with 5 joules and get the same output, but has never demonstrated this AFAIK. The claim of 100 COP would only be if he got the *same output* with an input of 5 joules; which, as far as I can tell, he has only speculated and not demonstrated.
With the equipment Jack has, he will not be able to adjust his spot welder for a 5 joule input. He will only be able to replicate what Mills has done, which is with an input of about 200 joules. Bob Higgins On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: > You have a point. > > Though my view is, it may not be worth making these elaborate > modifications. Are we striving for superaccuracy, or are we just trying to > hit it in the ballpark? To me, the most important question is to see if > the input power is in the vicinity of 5J. If it is, that would be a slam > dunk for Mills cause you can't deny the output power. Those Solar panels > have known efficiency figures. So, output power appears to be more or less > accurate, which would bring the COP to 100 or more - more or less. > > > Jojo > > >
