First, you can not guarantee that the water is 100% deionized, can you? DI water sold in stores is not completely Deionized.
Second, because you can not guarantee number 1 above, you can not guarantee that no electrolysis will occur. If there is current flowing thru that water, it will electrolyze water, possibly preventing enough energy to catalyze a hydrino transition. Water will electrolyze first before doing a hydrino transition. That is the chemical environment you are putting your electrodes in. You can not ignore this chemical process that will always take precedence over your hydrino transition. Bottom line is, you can not guarantee a hydrino transition under water. If you can not guarantee a hydrino transition, what then are you measuring with your water bath? You would just be measuring the heat of your electrolysis. This is the reason why I believe it won't work - it's a non-starter. I believe a better approach is simply follow Mill's lead. Use solar panels to measure output. Like I asked before, what is our goal? Is it to figure out a complete energy balance accounting or simply to verify certain aspects of Mill's claims. Jack needs to answer this for himself so that he can decide which direction to go. This is his experiment after all. Jojo ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob Higgins To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:SunCell - Initial Replication Attempt It would appear that you are not qualified to say that "calorimetry using water is a non-starter". First, in DI water there is no electrolyte added (just the opposite) and there will be no current flowing through this water being used to capture the heat and thermalize the UV. The DI water has no current, hence not hydrolysis. Second, Mills' experiment begins with water. Within the high current flow, the water in the porous metal container (particle) is thermally and electrically decomposed into various hydrogen, oxygen, and hydroxide species both neutral and ionized, though the voltage is specifically held low to help prevent impact ionization of the hydrogen (the hydrino state requires the electron). I proposed isolating the test pellet in a wax container so that the DI water does not contaminate the water in the test pellet, though that may not be necessary. If Mills is correct, the whole reaction is chemical. If you have a better idea for calorimetry, describe it. On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Jojo Iznart <[email protected]> wrote: In my opinion. Calorimetry using water is a non-starter. There is just to many points of entry where error can creep in. The biggest of which would be, will a hydrino transition even occur under water. It seems to me that it would electrolyze and split the water first before it initiates a hydrino transition reaction. Remember Ed's mantra - you can not ignore the Chemical environment.
