Ok - I can buy the cyclic reaction, but how do you explain the great
preponderance of Li-6 in the ash, compared to all other isotopes? That does
not indicate a cycle so much as a major shift... and where are the
intermediaries in the nearly pure sample - which would indicate one neutron
at a time? Surely you are not suggesting multi-body?
_____________________________________________
From: Robert Ellefson
Jones,
I can only give you the assurances that I received from the
report itself. All of the claims I am making are coming from there. Pages
28 and 53 describe the ICP methods as involving the entire sample mass.
I do not believe this is indicative of fraud. I believe
this indicates a cyclic reaction is occurring that results in a steady-state
heat-generating reaction that cycles between Li-7 and Li-6 and results in
Ni-62 enrichment. I put some more thoughts into this message:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg98422.html
-Bob
_____________________________________________
From: Jones Beene
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Isotope conversion
completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in
Let me put it this way, if what you say is
true - that the sample tested to 99.3% purity of Ni-62, then we have a major
problem. Are you certain?
...this information is very important, so
please assure us that is true.
Jones
From: Robert Ellefson
First, as I explain in this
(rather-long-winded) mail from yesterday, the ENTIRE ASH SAMPLE BULK was
analyzed by ICP-MS as consisting of 99.3% enriched Ni-62.
( see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html )
Allow me to repeat this crucially-important
point: The 2.13mg ash sample contained 2.12mg of PURE Nickel-62.
Only the SEM/EDS and ToF-SIMS methods are
restricted to analyzing the surface-layer composition.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
