Page 42: Thus, as expected from the EDS analysis the appearance of the ToF-SIMS spectra will differ depending on particle analyzed.
A test was done on one particle. It is possible that one particular particle (page 53...sample 1 ash) - could have been in a certain position that just so happened to produce almost pure Ni62). Transmutation may be a very chaotic process. In figures 6 through 11, I see no Ni62 at all. On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob, > > This makes sense to me, thanks - but an important question still remains. > > Why is the Ni62 nearly pure? The reaction was stopped for reasons which > were > pre-planned, and not related to a depletion of reactants. They made this > clear. > > Do you agree that the tested sample in question - should have been fully > loaded with the step-wise intermediaries Ni59, Ni60 and Ni61 - as opposed > to > almost pure Ni63? > > Jones > > _____________________________________________ > From: Robert Ellefson > > Recall that the bulk results show 57% Li-6 enrichment, vs. > 92% surface enrichment. I believe the higher fraction of Li-6 on the > surface is the result of starvation of the reaction cycle resulting in an > excess of Li-6 as compared to the steady-state balance during operation, > which is reflected in the bulk composition. > > Read these messages for further details: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98020.html (msg has > an > error, should read ni62, not ni68) > > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html > > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98422.html > > -Bob > > _____________________________________________ > From: Jones Beene > > Ok - I can buy the cyclic reaction, but how > do you explain the great preponderance of Li-6 in the ash, compared to all > other isotopes? That does not indicate a cycle so much as a major shift... > and where are the intermediaries in the nearly pure sample - which would > indicate one neutron at a time? Surely you are not suggesting multi-body? > > _____________________________________________ > From: Robert Ellefson > > Jones, > > I can only give you the assurances that I > received from the report itself. All of the claims I am making are coming > from there. Pages 28 and 53 describe the ICP methods as involving the > entire sample mass. > > I do not believe this is indicative of > fraud. I believe this indicates a cyclic reaction is occurring that > results > in a steady-state heat-generating reaction that cycles between Li-7 and > Li-6 > and results in Ni-62 enrichment. I put some more thoughts into this > message: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg98422.html > > > -Bob > > > > _____________________________________________ > From: Jones Beene > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2014 4:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Isotope conversion > completeness, was RE: [Vo]:Pomp weighs in > > Let me put it this way, if what you say is > true - that the sample tested to 99.3% purity of Ni-62, then we have a > major > problem. Are you certain? > > ...this information is very important, so > please assure us that is true. > > Jones > > From: Robert Ellefson > First, as I explain in this > (rather-long-winded) mail from yesterday, the ENTIRE ASH SAMPLE BULK was > analyzed by ICP-MS as consisting of 99.3% enriched Ni-62. > > ( see: > http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l%40eskimo.com/msg98350.html ) > > Allow me to repeat this crucially-important > point: The 2.13mg ash sample contained 2.12mg of PURE Nickel-62. > > Only the SEM/EDS and ToF-SIMS methods are > restricted to analyzing the surface-layer composition. > >
