Hi,

I think Horace is exactly correct. If such a particle
exists, (*e-) would almost certainly be relegated to
the inner orbital and not normally become a conduction
electron.

> a hot filament of any kind of a vacuum
> tube should act as an
> electronium concentrator. 

This is a good point and a possible way to test for
the particle. Take an old tungsten filament and place
it in a high x-ray or gamma field which is
significantly below the ~.5 MeV binding energy (say .3
MeV, but nevertheless look for the .5 MeV signature.

If a strong signal is seen in this spectrum, due to
reemission following electronium decay (and it would
be possible as it is probably on the energy tail of
the Maxwellian distribution), then that is a very good
indication for electronium, as there is no other good
way AFAIK to explain any upshifting of gamma
radiation.

Jones

IF this works,of course, it might also be a way to get
some OU out of old filaments...

Wouldn't that be an ironic turn of events?

You pay $5 bucks for a bulb and they promise to buy it
back for $25 if you will just put a few thousand hours
of use on it !!

Reply via email to