>From: Edmund Storms > NRL is now attempting to duplicate this work. This program was > undertaken well before the DoE review and apparently was unknown > to the reviewers. If, as expected, they replicate the Iwamura > claims, the ball game will be over. > >Ed
Hello Ed, Best guestamate as to when NRL will complete & publish their findings? Assuming the findings are confirmed and the "ball game" IS over, what is likely to happen next? Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com George Holz wrote: > Hi Jed, > > > See: > > > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/IwamuraYobservatiob.pdf > > > > - Jed > > The results described in these papers show that the > impurity migration idea is even more ridiculous (if that's possible) > than before. The isotope of the starting element controls the > isotope of the transmuted element. Explain that by contamination! > > Is there any way we can have this information forwarded to the > DOE reviewers. Perhaps they may find that it is time to save > their reputations by admitting the obvious. > Duplicating the Iwamura experiment with additional starting elements > seems like a reasonable suggestion to the DOE as a proposed > experiment to improve our understanding of LENR. Perhaps some of the > national labs have appropriate equipment that could be used > by LENR researchers to speed further work. How can anyone deny the > overwhelming theoretical and practical significance of this work! > > Thank you Jed for obtaining and posting this material. > > George Holz > Varitronics Systems > > > > > > >
