Jones Beene wrote:
>
> ...plus the neutron "contains" an electron
> antineutrino (at least one comes out on decay) and
> this beast may not be quantized, or if it is, the
> energy steps are so small that it may be able to drain
> energy away from an elliptical electron in small
> multiples - those which coincide with what the drop in
> the electron's angular momentum will accommodate -
> multiples of either 3.4 eV or 6.8 eV perhaps... there
> is very little evidence in the spectroscopy charts for
> the "full" 27.2 eV.
> antineutrino (at least one comes out on decay) and
> this beast may not be quantized, or if it is, the
> energy steps are so small that it may be able to drain
> energy away from an elliptical electron in small
> multiples - those which coincide with what the drop in
> the electron's angular momentum will accommodate -
> multiples of either 3.4 eV or 6.8 eV perhaps... there
> is very little evidence in the spectroscopy charts for
> the "full" 27.2 eV.
>
That 3.4 or 6.8 eV could be a low energy pair production species that
joins an electron to form Electronium-Light (**e-).
Mass About the same as
that of the electron, charge e- , spin 1/2 hbar, radius slightly greater than 3.0 Fermi.
No reason why low energy discharges can't allow this.
Frederick
