Hi Ed,

> I suggest several facts must be kept in mind when
proposing the hydrino
> explanation.

> 1. Energy is only released when hydrinos are formed, not
when
> accumulated hydrinos are returned to "normal".


That, of course, is part of Mills' explanation. But we
should keep in mind two things:

1) that he could very easily have discovered the process;
but yet he still got many of the details in his theory
wrong, or half-right.

2) there could be an autocatalytic stage, following build-up
of hydrinos over time.

Some of us have been saying for some time that it appears
from analyzing many of the past results, that the first few
redundant ground states of hydrino formation (at least the
first) could be endothermic, not exothermic.

Moreover, If at a certain stage in the ongoing process, the
shrinkage below ground state does continue and becomes
atuocatalytic - all the way down to n = 1/137 then of course
those last 100+ steps would shed tremendous energy very
rapidly. Had Mizuno been using a G-M monitor at the time,
there would have been a big spike at the time of the
explosion, as the lower stages are all soft x-rays, in
theory.

Jones


Reply via email to