Re: Higher Order Conservation Laws of Motion.

[Colin Quinney]

Subquantum Frank? That sounds a bit like La Violette or Robert Neil Boyd sub 
quantum physics. (Not that there's anything wrong with that ;)

Colin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Grimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-L@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: Higher Order Conservation Laws of Motion.


At 12:33 pm 22-02-05 -0700, you wrote:
note though, that after velocity, they all become a measure of the
rate of change.  where is the original motion that is being constantly
modified?  there has to be an endpoint, yes no?  or start point, as it
were.
Err....? Sorry, I don't follow you.
Isn't velocity a measure of a rate of change?
Isn't velocity a measure of a rate of change of position?
Or am I missing something.  ;-)
Does there have to be an endpoint or is it "elephants all
the way down"? If I had to take a bet on it I would say
that the Universe is unbounded in the small and in the large.
Cheers
Frank Grimer
    =========================================
    It's the first effect of not believing in
       God that you lose your common sense.
              - Father Brown -
    =========================================