> The payoff could be huge. Stay tuned. > > Jones Likewise Sizings at first become a formidable obstacle. Like the size of one's mind. The mind only needs one example for a theory to be possible. So many examples may exist that discrimination becomes necessary in this vast reserve of thought. But as the Russians say bigger is better...
It is possible to make a coil big enough so that its capacity to resonate at the designated frequency can fit inside the coil itself orthogonally, as an orthogonal axial capacity, creating an electric field at right angles to the magnetic field in their oscillations of stored energy. Such a flux capacitor idea resembles the zen koan; "What is the sound of one hand clapping?" Likewise in expansions of probable outcomes we eliminate that Zen and deal with the sound of two hands clapping. In this regard with timing two resonances co existing in time; but differing in phasing origins can react so and so... But anyhows looking at water capacities in this larger realm a simple fact was established that the AC capacity enclosed by the inductor in only a single phase developement of the flux capacitor shows that the enclosed electric field changing in time itself produces a changing magnetic field 90 degrees later in time; which in turn alters the original LC calculations based on the resonance. What it means is that actually three choices of C as the resonant value value exist according to how we arrange C in space. A situation can be conceptially arranged where when when water turns to ice, it instantly becomes engaged in a high voltage circuit by virtue of the axial water capacities C value becoming into the needed LC combination for resonance. Rather simply; a non resonant LC combination in water state becomes resonant when the water sample freezes. As such the crystallation formation of ice is accompanied by a regulation making the excessive voltage pressure dictated by the q factor to only appear during that phase transfer from liquid to solid state. It should easily be feasible to create "resonant ice" formations by that principle. And likewise simply freezing a sample of water to ice in a high voltage field is different in time to the situation where the high voltage is dependent on the freezing action alone, and not vice versa where the external environment supplies that requirement. With some things about imagination, it seems possible in the realm of dreams that diodic ice should be possible, once the water sample itself can be shown to perform that way, whereby in multiphasing of resonances spatially the closer in time coexistant magnetic and electric fields can be reacted spatially, the more the orthogonal reaction becomes unidirectional, acquiring a DC aspect. The first thought becomes complicated by the facts, it should not be possible to freeze a circulation of electric current in the the axial capacity C, because at the moment of freezing its C value significantly changes, but at the same time keeping this reverse engineering in mind it should be possible to create such a "imprint" upon freezing as a form of conditioning. But just some comments about ideas. A C value of 1-2 nf is used in my experimentation of alternator 480 hz resonances where I used plexiglass capacities, that produce a loud whining noise resembling a musical note pitch at 480 hz operation. An axial water capacity in this value will also whine, in a muffled version of that noise, but the water molecules are vibrating so severely to produce sound, and great surface tension. In that situation if the sample were to be frozen, it would loose all the high voltage by virtue of C value change. Thus one cannot simply "freeze" an action when the very act of freezing changes the requirements for action ect ect ect.... HDN
