In all the written info from the Correas, I never saw a mention of whether
they were going for a forward pulse or a reverse pulse or both.  With all
due respect to Mike, the Correas never proved that OU performance cannot be
done with a proper capacitor circuit.  Your idea of using a pulse
transformer to get reasonable voltages may have merrit, but I suspect that
the accompanying inductive reactance may be counterproductive.  Large
capacitors like 5600mfd @350vdc are $60 to $75 ea. So , get ready to spend a
little money.

You will also need ballast resistors ranging from 100 to 5000 ohm in order
to see the full range of the phenomena.  The 100 ohm will need to be 250
watt min.

In general I found that the rate of PAGD events is controlled by the ballast
resistor value and the intensity of the event is controlled by capacitance
across the tube.  This parallel capacitance cannot be electrolytic (
electrolytics burn up) and must be relatively small.  I have tried values
from 1 to 88 mfd.  I call this capacitor the initiator.  The Correas do not
use this circuit element.

While capturing rapid fire pulses with my caps and light bulbs did not show
any sign of over unity, I did do some single pulse experiments two years ago
that at first looked promising.

I was set up to capture a forward pulse with a 3mfd initiator cap and a
fairly high ballast resistor.  I noted the voltage on the filter caps of my
power supply and then switched off the 110vac. I then powered up the
circuit. A moment later I would get a single PAGD event and then I would
immediately shut off the circuit and read the voltage increase of the pulse
capture cap, and then read the voltage loss of the power supply filter caps.
I then did energy gain/loss calculations and often found the energy gain of
the capture cap to be more than the energy loss of the power supply filter
caps by as much as 11%.  This didn't really prove anything since these
results were within the capacitance tolerances of the caps.  But, like I
said, these positive results did not hold up during rapid fire operation.

I firmly believe that Paulo Correa is a truly brilliant person.  He has
called me a buffoon.  Perhaps he is correct in that judgement.  But, I like
to think that what I lack in genius I make up for in common sense.

Jeff

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Zell, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: Correa, etc.


> I respect your opinion and have spent considerable time analysing the
> patents and related comments by Aspden.
>
> There is a need to make the PAGD practical - huge banks of batteries
> aren't going to do it.  I think we need
> To look at pulse transformers to bring the voltages down to more useable
> levels.
>
> I e-mailed the Correas and received a reply that I interpret as meaning
> that no one has replicated their
> Results - at least, in any open, published fashion.
>
> A sad matter that requires some attention in regard to the Correas' work
> concerns their unusual state of
> Mind.  To put it simply ---- in a nutshell ----  they are far too
> contentious about their work. I have no
> Doubt that they will never achieve any practical commercial application
> of any of their fascinating research.
> Like it or not, technology is a human enterprise - with all the social
> obstacles that entails.  It's really
> Too bad but much the same happened to Tesla in his latter years. I wish
> things were different.  They should
> Take things in stride, accept that other people make mistakes and don't
> 'get it', without a lot of patience and help.
>
> Maybe that's for the best - they will never meet the same suspicious
> fate as Mallove or Paul Brown.
>
> I say the above also because their attitude of contention becomes
> infectious - and that inhibits the benefit that they sincerely
> Wish to promulgate.
>
> One of the wisest proverbs I ever heard is this:
>
> "Fashion is made by fools - but only fools defy fashion".  Reich had
> some brilliant insights but I would never
> Recommend his personality to others.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Carrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 9:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Correa, etc.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Zell, Chris
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 5:25 PM
> Subject: RE: Correa, etc.
>
>
> How did you handle capturing the pulses? Batteries?
>
> MC: Chris, if you are asking this question you are in no position to
> attempt
> the Correa PAGD experiments. You need to obtain the relevant patents and
> study them thoroughly, and then do your best to duplicate exactly what
> is in
> them. Don't try to be different, or 'improve' on what is disclosed. Jeff
> made a sincere effort, saw many effects, but not the key PAGD OU
> discharge.
> I wrote about this for IE some years ago.
>
> Mike Carrell
>
>
>
>
> From: revtec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 5:26 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Correa, etc.
>
>
> I have been doing PAGD experiments off and on since 1996.  I saw a lot
> of
> interesting things in the tube, and captured energy pulses on
> diode/capacitor circuits, but over unity eludes me.  Keith Nagle posted
> some
> pictures of my apparatus on his web site.  They may still be there.  It
> was
> a whole lot of fun working with this phenomena.  I hope you try it and
> let
> us know what you find.
>
> Jeff Fink
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Zell, Chris
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 4:31 PM
> Subject: Correa, etc.
>
>
>                   Has anybody replicated any of Correa's PAGD overunity
> claims?  I got a vacuum pump and other gear in hopes of building
> something
>                   that apparently nobody is pursuing. (???)
>
>                   On a separate note,  I just got done reading
> "Confessions
> of an Economic Hitman". It is an astounding book.
>                   I have little doubt that anyone who stands in the way
> of
> our oil based economic order could be killed.  If you have serious
>                   free energy findings, please be careful.  You could
> end up
> like Mallove , whatever his flaws.
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to