Fred,

> Is it possible that at BEC temperatures the nucleons of an
atom exhibit a large neutrino absorption cross-section?

You are suggesting that the BEC temperature of some isotopic
nucleons might differ and be much higher - and/or be
semi-independent of the whole atom, right? ... and therefore
since the rest mass energy of the neutrino, whatever it
might be (a few tenths of an eV perhaps) has an associated
wavelength in the terahertz spectrum, then.... should those
Condensed nucleons, which have become resonant at that
precise wavelength, come in contact with the very large
neutrino flux, the stage is set. That is, some of that flux
is thermalized at the temperature of the cell itself, so
that the Pd cathode which is a nuclear-BEC becomes resonant
with the thermalized neutrino flux, despite the kinetic
"temperature" of the electrons being much higher.

I hope that I am not putting words in your mouth?

Consequently, in a nucleus like Pd-106 or 108 (the most
abundant isotopes) a mechanism for "Cold Fusion" effects
might be dependent on a nucleonic BEC forming at relatively
high temperature, several hundred degree C, but only under
the high "effective pressure" of a fully loaded matrix.

Both Pd and palladium hydrides are superconductive at low
temperature. Laufer's "Theory of superconductivity in
palladium-noble-metal hydrides" actually preceded P&F by
three years. Also it should be noted that *high internal
effective pressure* has the same entropy reducing properties
as cold temperature. With Pd the loading ratio must get to
near 1:1 before this becomes a factor, such that internal
pressure substitutes for low temperature. Even at high
temperature, this full loading will give entropy properties
similar to a few degree K of effective low temperature, for
the nucleus especially.

When this parameter is reached, then the Pd nucleus can
absorb extra mass from the very high neutrino flux at a much
higher cross section than normal. This might have the
secondary effect of extending the radius for the nuclear
strong force, or many other strange phenomena (excess heat)
associated with some forms of CF, especially those where
less Helium is seen.

Ways to test this:

Compare two LENR cells, one of which has a lesser
concentration of Pd-105 in the cathode composition, which is
the isotope which could strongly interfere with BEC
formation. This would be very expensive, probably, unless
some of this kind of material can be "borrowed" from a
national lab.

or

Place one active CF cell in the direct geometric line with
the MINOS neutrino beam being sent from Fermi Lab to a site
in Minnesota, and then compare that with the same type cell
placed elsewhere. It recommended that, given the weather,
that the experimenter wait till spring, unless he likes ice
fishing.
http://www.azom.com/news.asp?newsID=2678

Which isn't a bad idea, since many "Grumpy Old Men" (ala
Walter Matthau and Jack Lemmon) may be involved in fishing
as a recreational pastime, while they await results from the
ongoing experiment. Hey, the first Grumpy-Old-Man to score
with the neutrino-enhanced work, might get the bonus prize
of scoring with Ann-Margaret (assuming he is still
interested in that kind of score, and Matthau doesn't
destroy his fishing hut out of spite).

Jones


Reply via email to