errm, nazis were atheists. lemarkian evolutionists philisophically, >if memory serves. > >yes, im in college. i didnt say they were all great. and actually, >ive been to iraq, about 6 years ago, as part of a high school exchange >program. the farm slums are a higher quality than here.
If it weren't for the oil revenues, the Arab nations would be fourth world economies, unable to even feed themselves. Having a socialist government handing out oil money gives then an illusion of prosperity. They are incapable of having either democracy or an advanced economy because many of the people are immoral and jealous. They also lack the legal system which is necessary in order to make a system like ours work. > as for >christian countries being better, hows about we take a look at >predominantly catholic south america. Don't confuse Catholicism, which is a mixture of Paganism and Christianity with Protestant Evangelical Christianity. South America was colonized by the Spanish and Portuguese, their legal system is different from those based on English Common Law, which is based on the Torah. >very third world. ohh, but >that probably wont cut it for you. i forgot, brown people dont count >in your little world. >How disrespectful of you to tell what counts in my world. One of our >senior Rabbis said that "there is only one race, and that is the >Human Race. > Leaking, you are a classic example of a miseducated person. You have been educated by liberals and never been exposed to the other world view. Liberal used to mean libertarian, however they have co-opted that word and and the word progressive. They have come to mean a leftist, or socialist. They also embrace what I can ABC, anything but Christianity. While there are are Christians among them, they don't believe in scriptural enerronacy. Once you accept that premise, you are free to throw out what ever is inconvenient about what the Bible says. They have this in common with Islamists who give lip service to the God of Abraham, but have their own version of Biblical stories. They Liberals have developed quite the mythos about their ideas, the first of which is that they are liberal. Another part of this mythos is that there is a difference between Marxism (Communism) and Nazism. Both systems are totalitarian. Both are opposed to the G-d of Israel. The Nazi's were openly pagan. On the other hand, Lenin, said that there were "two groups of people, those who knew what was going on, and the useful idiots." I can prove that the Marxist leadership agenda grew directly out of Satanism. The Communists killed people of the entrepreneurial class, the Nazi's killed people who were descended from Jews. Now, do you see any difference between them? because I don't. Liberals have the the misguided world view that begins with there not being a G-d who is the King, and the creator of the universe. Some of them have substituted the idea of the universe being god. Consequently they worship nature. One manifestation of this is the plan to reduce the human population to 500 million people. This assumes that they have a right to determine what is an appropriate population for the Earth, and I assume that you know what happens when you ass-u-me, eh? Some of them believe that the individual is god. It's best expressed by the New Age mantra, you are god, and I am god, and we are gods. Some of them have embraced Hinduism or Buddhism. Then there are those who really know what's going on, they worship Lucifer as god. In order to make sense of the universe the Liberals have created the theory of evolution and the spontaneous aggregation of the solar system. You may have noticed that Robert Park was quick to ridicule Intelligent Design when someone decided to include a sticker in a biology text pointing out that evolution was an unproven theory. This despite the fact that the chemical reactions which facilitate life are so complicated, that the probability of their happening spontaneously is 10 with over 100 zeros after it. Despite their grand claims they have made based on their ability to manipulate life at the genetic level, the scientists have no understanding of the energy field, Chi, which makes life work. Dolly, the sheep became an old sheep at the same speed as the animal from which the cells were taken, this is because they lack the ability to cause the genetic material to undergo the sexual fusion process which resets the genetic material. Then there is the matter of the Earth, and the system which surrounds it. Again the Liberals choose to ignore the complexity of the system. I also suggest Hugh Ross's Creator and Cosmos, which points out all the factors that have to be incorporated from the galactic level on down in order for life to exist. Liberals believe in free speech for themselves, but they are intolerant of differing opinions. Liberals love big government. In the more extreme forms of Liberalism, they want to do away with the family and institute the nanny state. We are rallying our forces here in Minnesota, to defeat a liberal plan which would force children into day care at one year of age. This is an attempt to begin planting the liberal agenda in their heads. This includes an early sexualization and a sexuality divorced from morality. They want to give mood altering drugs to children who don't fit into their cookie cutter educational system. What this amounts to is chemical castration of boys. Their agenda is to produce willing workers who will be effective cogs in the wheels of their machine. Once you have out lived your usefulness, they would just as soon that you die. To facilitate this they have developed chemical drugs and called them pharmaceuticals. They have established a high priest class of health providers and called them MD's, and outlawed all other forms of healing, and called the practitioners of them quacks. They support abortion and euthanasia, which destroys respect of human life, and embraces a culture of death. George Orwell and Aldous Huxley were both liberals who became disillusioned with what they saw developing in Russia. Orwell wrote Animal Farm, Huxley wrote Brave New World, and Brave New World Revisited. If you want to see just how screwed up the Liberal agenda is, it would suggest that you read them. Huxley pointed out that when sex is divorced from reproduction leads to sexual libertinism, Orwell that the bureaucrats would become a new ruling elite. The Liberal's agenda involves the destruction of America and the state of Israel. Consequently they will side with any force that is against either nation. This means that even though the Islamists treat women like chattel, the feminists support them. Even though the Islamists are even more puritanical about sexual matters than the evangelical Christians, the smut merchants of Hollyweird support them. Even though the state of Israel respects the rights of minorities, the Liberals side with them. Another liberal mythos is that we are uneducated trailer trash. Again, this is just the opposite of the truth. The hosts on Salem Broadcasting's daytime lineup, Laura Ingram, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved, and Hugh Hewitt, three of whom have JD's, and the fourth teaches Tanach (Old Testament) at the Judica University. Medved's latest book, Right Turns. is the story of how he went from being a Yale educated liberal agnostic, to an Orthodox and a conservative, is an excellent discussion of the subject. So why is this so important that I'm spending my time explaining this to you? Because the Time of the Gentiles has been fulfilled. It ended in 1967 with the conquest of Jerusalem by the Israelis. What follows in the final generation, which I expect to last about 40 years. YHVH has made it plane that there is no place for these people in the renewed world, and that they will be incinerated. Having had to suffer with them for the past half century, I say. good riddance. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply put, he is stating that his god has a bigger dick than any other god, and anyone who doesnt follow his particular little invisible man in the sky is inherently evil and not to be trusted. hes spewed out a series of untruths about liberal thinking that he hasnt even thought about, just accepted verbatim from conservative thinkers, then says that all liberals are brainwashed and cant think for themselves. pot, meet mr kettle. quite simply, if you talked this way about anything other than religion and politics, theres not a psych in teh world that wouldnt classify you as delusional man. hey, guess what? jesus was a liberal. he was also a jew. deal with it. On Apr 1, 2005 2:48 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > thomas malloy wrote: > > > About the same time Dennis Prager brought up the story of the poor > > schmoe in Canada. His mother took her twin sons in to be circumcised. > > [snip the rest -- seeing this once was more than enough] > > So score 1 for Abraham. Accidents and trauma as a result of > circumcision are not especially rare, and by the nature of the surgery, > the "accidents" tend to be horror stories. There is no _medical_ reason > for circumcision -- the only justification is religious, and the only > common religious reason is that pact Abraham made a long, long time ago. > > Just what was your point here, Thomas? That confronted with a medical > disaster, some doctors may make bad decisions that make the situation > worse? Or were you attempting to point out that circumcision is an > accident waiting to happen and should be abolished? > > Or were you just trying to gross out everybody on the list? > > -- "Monsieur l'abb�, I detest what you write, but I would give my life to make it possible for you to continue to write" Voltaire
