Hi Jed,

What's so hard to understand? If I can take a commodity
worth 4 cents and sell it to you for 16 cents, I make
a huge profit. If I install special meters that allow
you to buy the same commodity for 4 cents, I don't
make a huge profit.

Remember, I'm ALWAYS paying the peak cost, regardless
of how much the commodity costs to manufacture.

A good metering system would cut my electricity bill in
half at least.

Also, the readers are supposed to come once a month.
Why do you suppose there are times when I don't see
them for 4 to 6 months at a time? As I said, I'm here all
the time. But I'll agree that to really prove my case I'd
have to analyze my bill more carefully. That would
be hard though; because they're always estimating it's
very difficult without reading the meter every month
myself to know what's happening, and looking at Con Ed's
10Q's and K's. I do suggest that presumption of innocence
on the part of the electric co. may be a bit naive.

Actually, comparing the Gas and Electric co's are like
night and day. The gas co ( BUG ) is a model of efficiency
and honesty compared to the electric. They even give
you postage paid envelopes to mail in your check. The
only thing they do that I don't like is charge a large
fixed cost over what I actually use in gas. But I use
very little gas, and they have a big system to maintain.
They would go broke providing residential service without
gas heating. Hence the fixed cost. It's not even that much,
only about 13USD per month. I often contemplate
what savings I might get from a gas powered genset...
At current pricing it may well be practical.

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 12:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: What if all cars ran on electricity . . .


Keith Nagel wrote:


So why do we still have the meter service? If you
ask the electric company, they predictably complain
about the evil meter readers union. Well, I'm here to tell you,
most unions in this town are so horrifically corrupt
and toothless, that they are kept around _only_ to
provide cover such as above. The actual reason is
very simple, if you can buy electricity at 4 cents
a KW/H off peak and sell it at 16 cents KW/H,
WHY IN BOGS NAME WOULD YOU EVER WANT TO CHANGE THAT SYSTEM???

That hypothesis makes zero sense to me. It is always better for a company to 
have pinpoint control over prices. The more knowledge
of company has of demand and customer behavior, the more it can optimize 
profit. The price of oranges or fresh corn at a grocery
store varies from day-to-day (and sometimes from hour to hour) depending upon 
crop yield, futures and wholesale prices. The grocery
store optimizes the price to sell many oranges, make the most profit per 
orange, and to prevent spoilage from unsold goods. The
electric power company has the same kinds of problems. It has billions of 
dollars worth of equipment that sits idle for much of the
day, costing interest. Then at peak hours a does not have enough equipment and 
it has to buy electricity from other power companies.
The power company could make a much better profit if it could fine-tune prices 
to affect demand, and also if it could reach out and
turn off a few hundred thousand air conditioners by remote control the way it 
does in California.

I think we still have meter service because the power companies are not managed 
well and they do not employ the latest technology to
optimize profit.

The cost of collecting data from the meters is only a small percent of total 
expenses because meter readers only come around two to
four times a year, as Nagel noted. Your bill is based on your previous history 
consumption. I do not see why anyone objects to this.
Electric power consumption is usually quite predictable. The power company may 
overcharge you during some quarters, but it is bound
to undercharge you in others. Occasionally after you have been overcharged you 
get a statement saying you own no money, but this
seldom happens to me.

- Jed

Reply via email to