Terry Blanton wites,

from Terrence McKenna: "We are part of a symbiotic relationship with something which disguises itself as an extraterrestrial invasion so as not to alarm us."

A quote worthy of Douglas Adams.

...and the essence of how one can reconcile most these pregnant observations in past posts with:

"Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us."
       Bill Watterson,  cartoonist of "Calvin and Hobbes" fame

"It has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value."
       Arthur C. Clarke

"Men fear 'thought' as they fear nothing else on earth... more even than death.... Thought is subversive and revolutionary, destructive and terrible, thought is merciless to privilege, established institutions, and comfortable habit. Thought looks into the pit of hell and is not afraid. Thought is great and swift and free, the light of the world, and the chief glory of man.
       Bertrand Russell

"So far as I can remember, there is not one word in the Gospels in praise of intelligence."
       Bertrand Russell


Yes, there is deep meaning (and ironic humor) on several levels, which comes from the realization that we are not just the latest representative of a flawed animal species.

But one detail of that ironic-twist of epiphany is worthy of continuing re-emphasis ... and this point bears repeating since it is seldom embraced by the most ardent supporters of so-called "alien" intellignece - the phenomena in question. This point is demonstrated continually by those supporters who want to profit finanacially from from their own warped-perspectives, whether they be on fostered on the UFO-lecture-circuit, or from the pulpit of biggest church in town. There is sometimes remarkably little difference in the two warped viewpoints.

....and that is that the hidden "symbiotic" relationship is not based in any way on a physical presence, nor on benefiting a particular race or clan or even species, nor on an anciet text, nor on a flawed history of worhipping (mis-identifying) the accurated features of a spiritual presence which is now reaching critical mass, so-to-speak.

The "invasion" which will eventually relegate the human genome to the role of a preliminary-stepping-stone for the next evolutionary jump, derives from a self-realized invasion of "pure thought" a disembodied form of "intelligence" - and in keeping with the sentiment of several prior post's including that excellent one of Nick, that there is NO physical evidence whatever: nada, zero zilch - of any physical alien presence, now or ever, but in many cases sbstituing the word "divine" for "alien" can move one over many hurtles.

There is an extremely large amount of evidence for a subtle guiding "influence" which itself has only one common trait - extremely focused "intellignece" taking human form and directing the subject-species along a particular path - to eventually set the stage for "childhood's end." WE will be not only be conquered from within, we will become ultimately victorious because of relinquishing our prior mis-identity. IOW we are not (eventually) to be identified as a reprentative of a particular class of animal, but of a partiuclar class of thinker.

That subtle disembodied influence, in our preceding history, often called "angelic" or divine, no called "alien" has come in the form of the limitations inherent when an advanced "mentality" being transfered to a particular "carrier" such as a historical fugure - Buddha, Yeshua the Nazarean, Mohammed, but also... more relevant to the world of 2005 are those more modern but equally-astounding mentalities, so far ahead of their time - such as Isaac Newton and Paul Dirac. I place these later in importance above the former in some ways. The former got us to the stage of giving up some of our shared and natural animal brutality, but the later have brought us nearer to the stage of giving up some of our natural in-bred ignorance.

That task will take a while, if we are to prove that intelligence has any survival value.

Jones

Reply via email to