Naudin's latest test run, #83, claims COP of well over 20. See: http://jlnlabs.imars.com/mahg/tests/mahg2c.htm
Scroll down to the bottom, last test. Preliminary evidence seems to suggest that decreasing the duty cycle may increase COP efficiency even more. I bare my ignorance for all to witness here, but could some kind soul present in layman's term an explanation of how Naudin's recent MAHG COP values of 15 - 20 are arrived at? I understand basic electricity values - that wattage is calculated from Volts times Amperage. ...that wattage is a form of measured power. However, in Naudin's most current run (run #82) when I look at the chart titled "Power Input/Output Vs Time" it's not exactly clear to me how the OUTPUT POWER value is derived. Is this output power value derived directly, indirectly, or inferred? Said differently, it's clear to me that the INPUT power (expressed in wattage value) is derived directly from the battery source hooked up to the MAHG device. But how do these test runs arrive at the CALCULATED OUTPUT WATTAGE VALUE, such as 92.97 watts (averaged) as described in #82? One aspect of these MAHG runs that may be hindering my comprehension of the claimed high COP values is the temperature differential between input and output. At first glance my layman's interpretation of the delta (difference) leaves me confused and mostly unimpressed. The "Temperature Input/Output and Water Flow Vs Time" chart for #83 shows input temperatures averaging at around 20 C. Output temperatures are averaging, roughly speaking, around 23 C. That doesn't appear to be a very large temperature differential to get all that excited over. Granted, if water is flowing through the device very quickly, obviously that would decrease the amount of time the exposed water would have a chance to "heat" up. I realize Naudin gives the water flow amount, but unfortunately I don't have sufficient experience in these kinds of water-volume calorimetery values to fully comprehend the ramifications. Another related question: In practical terms, assuming the goal is to devise a way to extract copious amounts of presumed "OU" energy in the form of excess heat (steam?) that would be used to generate something like a sterling engine that ultimately runs a generator, doesn't the amount of output heat that would need to be generated from a device based on the MAHG principle HAVE to be a whole lot higher than what these preliminary experiments are currently showing? Mongo wishes to better understand MAHG COP values! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com
