> From: "Jones Beene" > > From: "Mike Carrell" > > > Yes, these reactions could go to completion, > > as Peter andJones have observed, but none of > > Naudin's runs have gone on long > > enough to test this. Two hours just isn't enough. > > But its the same cell, Mike, over and over ! He > has nearly 100 documented runs now and surely several > hundred hours of OU runtime and YET operatingthe > parameters of the cell stay the same. > > With only a few milligrams of H2 as fill - if fusion or > hydrino reactions were going on - as Terry and others > noticed immediately, even the few micrograms removed are > noticeable because the **operating parameters** change. > There is no getting around this fact. That is is why > Naudin thinks, and surely he is correct on this point, > that the hydrogen is reused over and over and nothing > is removed. > > Jones
Regardless of whether Hydrinos exist, as Mike has suggested might still be possible, or not, as Jones has retorted, what seems of paramount interest is to modify the frequency of the pulse AND to take a detailed analysis at the spectra of what is presumed to be the plasma generated within MAHG devices. At present it seems to me that continuing to focus on a 50 hz pulse is a criminally low frequency rate. OTOH, I'll quickly admit that this is a non-educated and totally subjective opinion on my part. Jones has already commented on the fact that the 50 hz cycle is coincidentally the same frequency France uses for A/C running through their national grid. On cannot help but wonder what the hell is going on with that dang number: 50 Hz! The sooner JLN labs (or some successor lab) shows test results using different frequencies (and hopefully much higher frequencies) the better I'll feel about the whole intriguing scenario. At present it remains my personal speculation that the utilization of significantly higher frequency cycles, (including shorter duty cycles, if possible) may help increase OU if it exists, as pertaining to the 2H -> H2 theory, and hopefully by a dramatic amount. Of course, I suspect I'm probably repeating the obvious here. As in blowing into a soda bottle in order to create a tone certain frequencies can create a significant monotone resonance depending on the internal volumetric shape of bottle. As I currently understand this theoretical process, stored "resonance" or energy should be able to be accumulated with an economically modest amount of input energy that in turn would be used to disassociate 2H into its atomic state if the amount of internal volume is clearly understood and calibrated correctly to the proper resonant pulse frequency. Roughly speaking, looking at the size of the current MAHG device, that is, if it were completely hollow and one were to blow into the top of the device (assuming there was a hole!) the tone produced should fall well within the range of the human ear - if the internal gas chamber was filled with normal atmospheric pressure. Roughly speaking, this suggests at least to me a frequency of around 200 - 1000 hz might be a more appropriate optimal "resonant" freq! uency range in which to explore. However, I would imagine that since there are many thingamajigs within the MAHG device (a tungsten filament and coolant transfer piping gumming things up, trying to calculate _the_ optimal internal resonance within the cavity becomes a much more complicated task. Perhaps a form of Finite Element Method Analysis might help in reducing the amount of guesswork involved. Mike, it seems to me that this kind of analysis might actually be up your alley! Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com
