At 10:53 PM 7/24/2005, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Also, corroborating this, we have made electricity for years using
cold fusion systems [since before our
first report in Fusion Facts (Hal Fox, editor) a decade ago when a small
light bulb first turned on by CF,
Are you claiming that ten years ago you were able to light a lightbulb
using energy generated by cold fusion?
That's sure what it sounds like. But if that's true, then ten years ago
you were way, way ahead of everyone else in the feld, and you were already
ahead of where everyone else in the field is today, as well.
Steven:
The generation of electricity by cold fusion, and its use to light LEDs and
a small light bulb
was first reported by us many years ago in 'Fusion Facts', following the
achievement in January 1996.
You can contact Hal Fox in Utah who briefly reported the event that Spring
in his magazine, if memory serves.
I had an issue somewhere around, but cannot find it at this moment.
I've been following this online off and on for some years, and five years
ago, you never seemed to have an answer to the jab, "Where's the water
heater?" on sci.physics.fusion. If you could power a lightbulb with CF ten
years back then surely you can make a water heater, too, even if it's only
a small one. Certainly, with energy to drive a lightbulb you could heat
enough water to make a cup of tea, and counter another of the standard
jabs directed at CF in the news groups. Why did you never say so?
Cup of tea? LOL. You could not drink the any liquid at the temperatures
we achieve.
[One run of core temperature is shown here:
http://world.std.com/~mica/jet.html
Is circa 90C not hot enough for you? ;-)X ]
We have been near-boiling water for years; and publishing the results
continuously,
and have even shown lower power demonstration units, including at the MIT
during the entire week of ICCF10 in the MIT EE building.
http://world.std.com/~mica/jeticcf10demo.html
Never say so? ROTFLOL. There has long been more than enough "jabs"
consisting of scientific data
for the skeptics. However, most of them are more interested in hot air
than cold fusion, it seems.
FWIW, more than 45 papers and presentations at many conferences and a
public demonstration at MIT
suggests much has been "said". partial refs
at: http://world.std.com/~mica/jetrefs.html
Send me a snail mail address by private email,
if you would like a copy of the COLD FUSION
TIMES http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
to find out what is really going on in cold fusion.
Mitchell Swartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
