At 07:54 AM 8/1/2005, you wrote:
Has anyone considered the fact that by choosing to
publish such an unprofessional reply by a GRAD STUDENT
that perhaps The Crimson is actually showing covert
support for CF by undermining the case against it?
I agree with Jed, I don't think so.
However, I think the profs' and other so-called physics pundits are being a
lot more careful about what they say about CF these days. I think Happer
was the only one to continue saying outright foolishness to the press in
recent memory. I refer to a quote of his in Physics Today regarding the
2004 DOE CF where he said something about burying it again for a final
time, and true believers <gasp> will always keep on believing.
s
