At 08:13 pm 24/08/2005 -0400, you wrote:

>
> Well, I didn't quite get all the pages downloaded before I 
> peaked the group's bandwidth limit.  What *is* a group's 
> limit on Yahoo?

Dunno - It's never worried me - I'm a patient man. 
One has to be when one pioneers new concepts. <grin>

>
> I'll finish tomorrow because I want the CE department head 
> to give me his comments.  The comment regarding the 1968 
> safety factor change on post stressed concrete came from 
> one of his employees.  It led us to a discussion on how 
> concrete is treated as a liquid.  I introduced him to the 
> B-atm concept and we wound up wasting two hours of company 
> time on the discussion (4 man hours  :-).  He loved the 
> vortex ring idea and overloaded on the images of the 
> Hutchison Effect.
>
> He worked on the Cooper River Bridge project.  
>
> If ever a bridge was beautiful.


I agree. I like the shear leg diamond design. More sensible 
from an engineering point of view, than the twin towers 
cable stay bridge over the Thames.....

http://www.colinfparsons.btinternet.co.uk/twinp/colhome/Waverley/default.htm

The Thames QE2 bridge is reminiscent of the spindly Tay bridge - 
the original one that fell down.

     ==============================================
     Beautiful Railway Bridge of the Silv'ry Tay!
     Alas! I am very sorry to say
     That ninety lives have been taken away
     On the last Sabbath day of 1879,
     Which will be remember'd for a very long time.

    'Twas about seven o'clock at night, etc.,
     ==============================================

http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm

Cheers,

Frank

Reply via email to