At 01:50 pm 25/08/2005 -0500, Harry wrote: > So far Yahoo has only allowed me to download a few pages from your paper.
I must confess I never had any problems downloading stuff from Yahoo sites. Perhaps someone was downloading stuff at the same time. If you keep having problems let me know and I will send you the relevant stuff as attachments to e-mails. This is what I did for Beene and though my line is only a 56 Jones has a fast one so it downloaded at his end like lightning. > This is just a suggestion, but it seems to me the focus of your theory > should be the nature of charge instead of mass. In other words > charge is an inverse velocity and not mass. Maybe they are both functions of velocity at different scales, eh! 8-) > I say this for two reasons. First you are concerned with the strength of > materials which is an electromagnetic phenomena and secondly by choosing the > velocity of light as a datum you have chosen another electromagnetic > phenomena. Fair point. Frank
