At 08:08 PM 9/13/2005, John Coviello wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mitchell Swartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: "John Coviello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: CF Suppression?
At 06:41 PM 9/13/2005, you wrote:
"In fact, by relying on such "cherry pickings" and the rants of the other
'usual suspects', it also demonstrates
that the Patent Office has deliberately ignored open demonstrations of
cold fusion by Prof. John Dash,
by Dennis Cravens, and by my group, JET Thermal Products, which
demonstrate conclusively that
they have no foundation for their egregious behavior.
In all due respect, that definitely seems like the onus is on the Patent
Office
Spot on, sir.
The Patent Office should respect the US Constitution -- and the
directive of the US Congress.
Instead, they have acted systematically against the interests of US security.
First:
"The Congress shall have Power ... To promote the Progress of Science
and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times
to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective
Writings and Discoveries"
Article I Section 8
Second:
Patentable statutory subject matter spans "anything under the sun that
is made by man'".
[S. Rep. No. 1979, 82d Cong., 2d Sess., 5 (1952); H. R. Rep. No. 1923, 82d
Cong., 2d Sess., 6 (1952)].
These citations, and the history wrought by the obstructionists in the
Office using their
professional pathological skeptics, demonstrates CF suppression.
Q.E.D.
Those interested in this more, should review many of the previous
issues of the COLD FUSION TIMES.
Dr. Mitchell Swartz
========================================================
Cold Fusion Times http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html
The journal of the scientific aspects of loading isotopic fuels into
materials ISSN# 1072-2874
JET Thermal Products http://world.std.com/~mica/jet.html
Working for Safe and More Efficient Heat Products to Serve You
