But you would admit rather easier than a f.ss.on device. Oh no! I'm not going down that route of discussing f.ss.on devices in detail on a public webserver. Oh no! I don't want to raided, tortured, sent to Guantanemo and then denied legal process.
Let me state categorically: I'm a lapsed CofE, I've only been in a mosque once! I love T Blair, I love Dubya, I love the Queen, I love the West, I think the status quo is just great. Honest,...., honest! No joke!! Anyone at MI5/6/GCHQ reading this, you've got a sense of humour, right!? Echelon, echo, echo, echo. I must learn to love big brudder, I must learn to love big brudder. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edmund Storms Sent: 20 September 2005 15:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Due Diligence on CF Of course CF is dangerous. Any source of energy is dangerous in the wrong hands. In this case, the danger is also economic. Any country that has such a cheap and easily used source of concentrated energy can bankrupt any country that relies on conventional sources. Even though the US starts to use CF in the future, the country that starts using the method will always have an advantage because they will have the technicians and professionals who are in a position to stay ahead of everyone else. Of course, the originating country can always drop the ball as the US has done on several occasions, but that is a different problem. Ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>The Chinese are a different story. If they develop cold fusion several >>years before we do, they will be in a position to develop the weapons are >>described in my book, in chapter 11. > > >>- Jed > > > Are you saying that CF could be dangerous? Do you all risk doing an E. > Teller by putting naked ambition before humanity? > > Ars gratia artis (art for art's sake)? Heard the one about Pandora and her > box? > >
