The following article has a bearing on the action of the
Beta-atmosphere

  ==========================================================
  Oct 6th 2005 
  From The Economist print edition

  A dose of Clap

  Putting dust in your engine sounds crazy. But it might 
  not be.

  ALTHOUGH they need to fire their brand consultants, the 
  inventors of Clap — an additive intended to improve the 
  fuel-efficiency of car engines—seem to be on to something. 
  By pulverising a mineral called serpentine into particles 
  a millionth of a millimetre in diameter, they have come 
  up with an additive which, they claim, can improve the 
  fuel consumption of old car engines by as much as 10%. 
  And, a millionth of a metre being a nanometre (sic), 
  they are also claiming that their product is an example 
  of that much talked of, but little-seen field known as 
  nanotechnology.

  The Clap project began in 1979 at the presciently named 
  Institute of Nanotechnology in Moscow. The idea was to 
  produce not a fuel additive, but a lubricant additive. 
  The institute's engineers, led by Fiodor Wischnjewsky, 
  thought that adding a suitably fine powder to an old 
  engine's oil would effect continuous running repairs by 
  filling in tiny cracks and abrasions in the cylinders 
  and pistons. These irregularities make combustion 
  inefficient, which increases both fuel consumption and 
  pollution.

  This being first the Soviet Union and then Russia, 
  nothing much happened until 2002 when Francesco 
  Meneguzzo, an engineer at the Biometeorology Laboratory 
  in Florence, got wind of the project. Then things started 
  moving.

  The Italians ditched the Russians' efforts to design 
  copper, zinc, aluminium and silver nanopowders. These 
  rendered the oil too fluid. Instead, they concentrated 
  on serpentine, a substance rich in magnesium silicate 
  which was found to cling efficiently to the internal 
  surfaces of all common petrol and diesel engines. 

  The problem was how to crush this mineral into small 
  enough particles on an industrial scale. Industrial 
  grinding mills made of hardened steel cannot be used 
  since they release heavy metals into the milled rock, 
  replicating the problems of metallic nanopowders. To 
  overcome this, the engineers came up with a two-stage 
  process, the first stage of which goes back to the 
  origins of grinding mills by employing actual millstones 
  made of granite. The second stage is ultramodern, though. 
  The particles of mineral-flour made by the millstones are 
  blown into nanosmithereens by tiny electrical charges.

  The result, which requires a half-gram dose to be 
  squirted into a car's oil every 40,000km, will go on 
  sale in December. Old cars may soon, therefore, be 
 clapped out in more senses than one

  ==========================================================


When I was researching the strength of clays and stabilized 
soils, preparation of the material entailed mixing in a sun 
and planet mixer of the type used in the food industry. 
Depending on the moisture content the material reached an 
equilibrium at a particular grading of lump sizes. As any 
gardener would expect, the average lump size decreased as 
the moisture content decreased.

At the equilibrium grading point there are two processes 
taking place. The larger lumps are being broken up into 
smaller lumps and the smaller lumps are coalescing into 
larger lumps. Individual mineral grains therefor are 
travelling up and down the lump size in a similar manner 
to, say, the way that individual water or air molecules 
travel up and down the vortex spectrum.

To my surprise a literature search showed that in any 
mixing grinding process a similar equilibrium grading 
is formed. For instance if you grind up marble eventually 
you reach as stage where the particles of marble are 
"cold welding" themselves together as fast as they are 
being broken up.

I believe that in grinding up the serpentine mineral as 
described above the manufacturers must have reached such 
an equilibrium boundary at well above the nano-scale 
size and that is why they had to find some other method 
to take them on down to the nano-scale.

Now we have met the action of sparks before and suggested 
that they generate Beta-atmosphere vacua in the form of 
Beta-atmosphere vortices. I believe that is how the 
serpentine minerals are being broken up into nano-sized 
particles. In effect the serpentine is falling apart 
because it is no longer being held together by ambient 
external Beta-atmosphere pressure.

Assuming the above view is correct, I doubt if serpentine 
is essential to process. I would imagine that many other 
minerals would be as good or better. 

Cheers,

Frank Grimer






Reply via email to