Sometimes you guys are discussing the details instead of the concept.
Believe me although I never been advising the government. Yes, I did talk
to a prominent world politician and found him just a a bunch of well
formulted sentences.
I agree with David. The problem is that we allow the private and the
publicc sector to implement laws that are not agreed to by most
people An example.I went to the landfill the other day. I had been there
before it is rather modern. ! it is indoors. It says STOP HERE. Then you
give the papers to the attendent and then you pay. Easy. This time the guy
said you have to take off the tarp before enterting. I said why?. He said
because everyone else does. They are just to big. Jed I do garbage jobs. (
They are well paid regardles the authorities taxes you extra for that type
Of job:)
James you can try the numbers game. Sorry this is not the issue. I agree
that there is a need for some bureucratic input but that is a 5 minute
phaase. Then the real work can begin. The reason is there has to be
passion for the idea. The idea is to bring our failing system into a
realistic modern thinking. I can voice negative reasons why it will fail
until the cow . .
I really like the input fr om you and Dave it just proves the point. Of
course Randy's comment tells you the reality. The bureacrazy is the
problem. A Swedish authour wrote about it in "The red room" in the early20
centuriy. Read it: A
ugust Strindberg was his name. The bureaucrazy only survive in large
organiztions and they can sooner or later claim that the emperor's clothing
looks great, although a small kid can see he is naked. Smaller
organizations less bureaucrazy and common sense. That is all it takes.
