Axil and Jed, etal--

I had also a deference to Ed's conclusion.  

I concluded that,If the results of the Pahlavani paper correctly identify the 
"super heavy" atoms, it seemed the reaction must involve nuclear reactions of 
some sort  In addition  the laws that are in effect (apparently affecting 
nuclei) may also effect the results of reactions like that claimed in the 
Lugano with its report of changes in nuclear constituents.  

Of course in that the definition of LENR is vague, the Lugano report may not be 
considered LENR in Ed's estimation.   I assumed that was the basis for his 
comment.  
And thus I am not  surprised by Ed's conclusion, since during our mutual 
participation on this blog, Ed consistently said that the phenomena of LENR was 
not nuclear.  I do not know what his comment has been, if any,  relative to the 
Lugano report, and its finding of nuclear changes in the fuel to the ash.   

Bob


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Axil Axil 
  To: vortex-l 
  Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 12:28 PM
  Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pahlavani paper


  With all respectful deference to Ed Storms, I have a contrary opinion on the 
subject of the transuranic fusion products based on fusion. If any transuranic 
elements are detected in transmutation, there is no known nuclear reaction 
outside of a supernova explosion that can produce such elements. That is to 
say, NO REACTION, whether by hot or cold fusion can produce these super heavy 
elements from light elements. 




  When Ed Storms analyzed the transmutation byproducts from LeClairs cavitation 
experiments, Ed himself listed in his ash analysis of LeClair's experiments, 
super heavy elements. LeClair initialized his reaction with just aluminum and 
water.




  Ed stated that LeClair's results were not the result of cold fusion. But by 
any reaction outside of a supernova, transuranic elements cannot be formed 
under any circumstances. According to current theory, normal stellar fusion ash 
production stops with iron and can go no higher in terms of atomic weight. A 
valid cold fusion theory must explain the formation by transmutation of super 
heavy elements.



  On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
    Ed Storms tells me this has nothing to do with LENR.

    - Jed

Reply via email to