Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:
> In fact with no radioactivity, this looks as much like a version of a > fractional hydrogen reaction - f/H – as nuclear. Isotope analysis could > move it into the LENR camp - but as of now, no conclusion is justified. > There is never much radioactivity from these systems. You cannot draw conclusions from that, other than the fact that it ain't plasma fusion. Based on McKubre's Law of the Conservation of Miracles I assume that all of these systems operate by the same physical principles. If this works by the Mills effect, they all do. I do not think it is likely there are two totally unrelated heretofore undiscovered methods of getting massive amounts of anomalous heat from hydrides. > It will be noted by those who have shown a propensity to jump to > conclusions, that the Rossi testing (Lugano) did reportedly turn up > anomalous isotopes – and thus, the experiment is reputedly LENR. > Even if he did not turn up anomalous isotopes, or if the isotopes turn out to be a mistake, I am confident that every expert in LENR would agree that if the results are real, they are LENR. > But the bottom line is that without isotope data from Parkhomov, no one > should jump to conclusions at this early stage. > That's silly. The system looks like several other nanoparticle cold fusion systems such as Mizuno's and Arata's. It is not jumping to conclusions to assume that it is the same phenomenon. Nature often produces phenomena that look different on the surface but are fundamentally the same thing. - Jed
