I will say, though Jed, kudos for expressing such confidence in an experiment so easily replicated. You really are putting your reputation and credibility on the line here in a way that is very impressive.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: > And how do we even know this is cold fusion? I think you are the one that > is leaping to conclusions here. Maybe wait for some kind of ash analysis > first... > > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y3Bxr_aE2iosEKpGFUZiQgAcuT8AFN78RFCAlR-JqNw/edit >> >> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Blaze Spinnaker<[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> Note by translator Stoyan Sarg: The initial heating power and >>> temperature before reaching 10000C is not shown in the plot of slide >>> #16 (does he mean 17?). Is it taken into account for the accumulated >>> energy? If not a much longer test is needed for estimation of the COP. >>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Jed -- I'm simply taking Stoyan's comment, verified it to make sure I >>> understood what he was saying, and repeated it. >>> >>> If you want to call Stoyan ignorant and arrogant, be my guest.. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Don't get me wrong, the results are interesting for sure. The COP is >>>>> making huge assumptions that the excess energy would continue. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, those are not huge assumptions. The excess heat in cold fusion has >>>> often continued, sometimes for weeks or months. With a reaction as large as >>>> this, they might have trouble quenching it, but I doubt they would have a >>>> problem maintaining it. The 8-minute burst of heat after death indicates >>>> that. (I am assuming it is a real effect and not an experimental error, and >>>> I am assuming it is cold fusion.) >>>> >>>> YOU are the one making huge assumptions, and ignorant statements about >>>> a subject you apparently never bother to study. You keep coming up with >>>> assertions that fly in the face of what we know about cold fusion. You >>>> think you have some kind of mystical power to predict whether cold fusion >>>> exists to with a percentage point, yet you don't bother learning anything >>>> about it. I find that arrogant. And annoying. >>>> >>>> - Jed >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
