Dear Jed, I have spoted that GSVIT critic of your position on the Mizuno experiment https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2015/01/05/misura-calorimetrica-sulla-pompa-md-6k-n-utilizzata-da-tadahiko-mizuno/
through google translate it seems to claim that the pump heat about 4W, not 1W probably you will need a real translation to address the questions. best regards. 2014-11-24 21:23 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > I made some revisions to my "Report on Mizuno's Adiabatic Calorimetry." > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJreportonmi.pdf > > On page 15 I added a photograph of the equipment with the aluminum foil > tent over it. On page 24 I added a discussion of heat from the circulation > pump. The key point is: > > > ". . . [W]ith this method of adiabatic calorimetry the 0.6°C temperature > increase over ambient is not included in the calculation of excess heat, > because the pump is left on all the time, and it always does the same > amount of work, so the temperature is always 0.6°C above ambient. To be > specific, with this method, the starting water temperature is subtracted > from the ending water temperature, and the starting temperature is already > 0.6°C warmer than ambient. > > With other methods of calorimetry, heat is measured by comparing the > reactor temperature to ambient. With these methods, heat from the pump has > to be subtracted from the total, or it will be mistaken for excess heat." > > > - Jed > >
