*Mizuno measured the heat added to the system by the pump. There is no point to appealing to a theory or hypothesis about how much heat there may be when it has actually been measured for 18 hours by running the pump only.* dear Jed,
I could not find anymore the excel file of this 18 hour measurement [it used to be http://LENR-CANR.org/Mizuno/Mizuno2014-11-20.xlsx] In that file it was clearly shown that the water temperature, with no excess heat, rised by 2.5 °C in a stable way against the room temperature. Is not it too much for 0,24 W? Could you post the file again? Many thanks 2015-01-08 16:39 GMT+01:00 Jed Rothwell <[email protected]>: > Gigi DiMarco <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This is completely wrong: the pump power is not transformed into kinetic >> enegy of the water, otherwise you will get after a while an infinite >> velocity, not only for the water inside the tube but for cars on motorways >> as well. >> >> Let me point out again that this entire discussion is irrelevant for two > reasons, which I clearly explained in the paper, starting on p. 24: > > 1. Mizuno measured the heat added to the system by the pump. There is no > point to appealing to a theory or hypothesis about how much heat there may > be when it has actually been measured for 18 hours by running the pump only. > > 2. It makes *no difference* how much heat is added to the system by the > pump. Whether the temperature goes up 0.6°C, or 6°C or 10°C, and whether > this temperature represents a half watt, or 5 W, or 10 Watts is completely > irrelevant. The pump is left running all the time. Therefore all of the > heat from the pump is in the baseline temperature of the system. Mizuno > measures from the baseline to the terminal high temperature at the end of > the test, just as the temperature begins to fall. He does not measure from > the ambient temperature. > > I wish the people writing these critiques would spend a few moments > reading the paper, but they never do. > > I am not even going to bother adding these remarks to the latest paper. I > am busy. If someone here would like to, feel free to add these points. It > is a waste of time, I think. > > - Jed > >
