It can be fun to tease out responses, here is a rant, take it for what it is:
All science history shows that if you can express things a magnitude of order more elegantly and easily and less convoluted you have a better theory, this is what Mills theory does compared to quantum mechanics. That clever science people does not understand this simple fact, that their pet theory is a guesswork and data fit, that has been ongoing since the start of the development of quantum mechanics, and fail to see that they are of the same intellectual mind as those supporting the earth centric model when Keppler showed up ( and forced him to rework his theory for anotther 10 years) - is beyond me. This fact is a death blow to my admiration of our scientific community, it's a bloody crime, Einstein is probably turning in his grave and was again right: QM is a shit theory and a huge joke. Now hydrinos are real, and the question is not if they can exists, but how practical the are. Mills say it's so, shows some arguments, tests that can be done to verify it and so on. The science community answer to this is quite apethetic, just a la la la la sound and looks the other way. Now you may argue that Mills has not been able to show it working for 20 years or so. Yeah so what, how do you know how to create these things? From the theory we know that you must pass quite a barrier to produce a hydrino from normal hydrogen, the electric field of the trapped photon is fundamentally different in hydrinos than in normal hydrogen, you have to get over something similar like a coloumb potential (not as extreme though) to do the transform, so the quest from the beginning was not written in stone although Mills had great hopes because he knew that the theory is correct. The time to achieve reproducible and good over unity take long with some promising tries that fell out badly (so what this happens to typical research as well in 9 out of 10 cases) he needs to milk in money so he can't keep quite about it, he need to think positive to perform unhuman achievements, and he does. Everything is fitting. Now if you think that Mills should have gotten a Nobel price by know if I am correct, you are right, but what got him is the bad mouthing of some lesser brained people and the internet is just a huge litter box of misstakes and shit academic arguments like the "scientist" in the new movie about Moses and the exodus out of Egypt. That he comes out arrogant is just a natural progression of the event of history. I end this rant with a hint for those who know calculus worthy of a normal electrical engineer, lookup his calculation of the g-factor. It's a neat simple exercise. The quest is horrendously difficult in QED (quantum mechanics) and could be the result of wishful thinking. This QED quest is put on a pedestal as one of the greatest achievements of modern science, and a quality mark of QM, so again, as history has shown, most people are stupid and does not do their groundwork, not Einstein though, that's a hero. Cheers!
