Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: please don't say you predicted the problem of DGT demo. > I was observing the critic and as I say, all was criticized as all > fraud... electricity, water, thermocouple, >
Good point. > ... as i say deniers are a dead clock totally useless to find reality. > "A stopped clock is right twice a day." (An analog clock.) > even people saying it was the flowmeter, did not have enough data to be > sure. > Well, soon after the conference McKubre and others pointed out that the flowmeter data showed on the screen looked irregular. Chaotic, that is. They said that the actual flow rate should have been stable, so this was a sign of an instrument error. They could not be more specific than that, but the flow rate was the biggest concern. > we needed more data to be sure of any hypothesis, and Luca Gamberale gave > the required data. The absence of answer confirmed the hypothesis. > I think you mean the absence of a response from Defkalion. The fact that they never disputed his report. I agree that confirms his hypothesis. - Jed
