Agreed – the feedback loop has to be expedited –all we are seeing now is equivalent to carefully balancing a pen on its nose –otherwise the experiment self destructs the geometry causing the effect or starves the raction below OU. We won’t see robust LENT [LENR+] until somebody develops a feedback loop that locks into this narrow window and keeps it there.. and even then there will still be a challenge that the fringes of the quantum reaction don’t fluctuate which would disrupt the thermal control loop.
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 12:48 AM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Heater circuit problems So sorry, please excuse me but I have developed an opinion. These heater power failures are caused by the LENR reaction and if not immediately countered, these power drops will delay the onset of the LENR reaction. A 5 seconds response time to counter is far to long a time delay to increase the current flow to the heater. I don't believe that MFMP counters this heater behavior at all since they have no constant power circuit mechanism in their heater power supply. Like MFMP, the Russian experimenter sees temperature variations of up to 100C. This is very primitive an unsophisticated experimentally. A nanosecond might be enough of a response time lag to counter the heat circuit current drop. This unusual superconductor onset behavior is causing long startup times for the onset of the LENR reaction. I hope that Brian Ahern will develop constant power circuitry to add elegance to his experiment to greatly increase the response time for the onset of the LENR reaction and thereby increasing experiment turnaround times.
