Your power supply could be faulty. I sagest upgrading your power supply
until the power variations on calibration runs are eliminated. You might
try to use a fast response time pulsed voltage regulator. Your data is only
as good as your power supply.

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:53 PM, AlanG <[email protected]> wrote:

> I also saw temperature excursions during my sealing tests. The swings I
> saw were as much as 20 degrees C at 1 second sampling interval, with a
> period of 10-30 seconds. My tube contained only air at 10 bar and 700 C,
> and no 'fuel', so I think these swings are at least partially due to
> convection patterns and possibly resonant pressure standing waves in the
> hot gas.
>
> The heater power also wanders over a range of 1-2%, due to instability of
> the variac carbon brush on the transformer wire. The CCI Compact Fusion
> controller used in the Lugano test does have an optional constant power
> control mode. Most phase-angle controllers don't offer this option.
>
> AlanG
>
>
> On 1/18/2015 9:48 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
>
>> So sorry, please excuse me but I have developed an opinion. These heater
>> power failures are caused by the LENR reaction and if not immediately
>> countered, these power drops will delay the onset of the LENR reaction. A 5
>> seconds response time to counter is far to long a time delay to increase
>> the current flow to the heater. I don't believe that MFMP  counters this
>> heater behavior at all since they have no constant power circuit mechanism
>> in their heater power supply. Like MFMP, the Russian experimenter sees
>> temperature variations of up to 100C. This is very primitive an
>> unsophisticated experimentally.   A nanosecond might be enough of a
>> response time lag to counter the heat circuit current drop. This unusual
>> superconductor onset behavior is causing long startup times for the onset
>> of the LENR reaction. I hope that Brian Ahern will develop constant power
>> circuitry to add elegance to his experiment  to greatly increase the
>> response time for the onset of the LENR reaction and thereby increasing
>> experiment turnaround times.
>>
>
>

Reply via email to