Yes!! ! I will forward your citation to Jan Naudts who wrote “On the hydrino
state of the relativistic <http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0507193.pdf>
hydrogen atom”<http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0507193.pdf> in 2005. The article
supports the many claims of radioactive gas decay anomalies when said gas is
loaded into skeletal catalysts or nano particles of conductive metals such as
ni or Pd [snip] the authors show that time
dilation<http://phys.org/tags/time+dilation/> occurs between a
self-accelerating particle that propagates along a curved trajectory and its
'twin' particle that remains at rest." [/snip]. Perhaps this even supports
Shawer’s “impossible” drive which he has already claimed is based on
relativistic principles [pushing electrons to age instead of displace spatially
while the “opposite” side of the reaction results in spatial displacement?]. I
was very happy to see them utilize the paradox twin example but think they
should have made clear these time dilations are opposite in nature, The
stationary electron is equivalent to the near C paradox twin while the “self
accelerating” beam is negative acceleration – it only occurs in LENR when
geometry suppresses longer vacuum wavelengths from fitting between Casimir
boundaries AND I will assume these new nano- holographic like masks they are
constructing are based on the same Puthoff type vacuum engineering as the
Casimir geometry tapestry found in skeletal cats or nano particles of Ni. I
make the point of opposite time dilation because this is very much related to
catalytic action [note Peng Chen at Cornell discovered cat action only occurs
at openings and defects in nano tubes = change in geometry just like nano
powder tapestry and skeletal cats] – the dilation occurs in opposite direction
to the electrons suppressed such that they age much faster [catalytic engine?]
and when they return to their stationary radioactive twins discover they have
hardly decayed at all and that locally only a short amount of time has elapsed.
I’m not sure if it should be called zero point energy because
random migration causes the gas atoms to migrate into these suppressed regions
or if Shawyer is correct to label this relativistic but I don’t think anyone
would argue that hydrogen expelled from the suns corona at different velocities
represent an energy differential but not practical to exploit –like wise if
there existed a way to break the isotropy and segregate a gravitational well
into a tapestry of different equivalent accelerations [9.6 m/s^2 II 10 m/s^2]
with a boundary permeable to gas atoms we could easily build a system to
exploit the differential –but that would violate macro physics. Quantum physics
however does allow a breach in the isotropy when the Casimir inverse cube law
trumps the gravitational square law down in the single digit nano meters of
boundary displacement. It allows for a tapestry - not of gravity
Wells[compressed vacuum wavelengths] but instead a tapestry of gravity Hills/
warps [suppressed vacuum wavelengths] such that the differential between their
suppressed state and their stationary twin is equivalent to the differential
between the stationary twin and his near C sibling.
Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:46 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:New analysis shows a way to self-propel subatomic
particles
http://phys.org/news/2015-01-analysis-self-propel-subatomic-particles.html
Welcome to the new physics...
We can manipulate the waveform of the electron using a phase mask to increase
its energy up to the speed of light. This uses the theory of relativity to
convert the electron into a spread-out wave with lots of energy. In a time
dilation tradeoff, particle lifetime is lengthened to increase the energy of
the particle.
Could the special surface of the nickel micro particles in the Rossi reactor be
a phase mast to accelerate stationary electrons to a ultra high energy wave
shape?
There is always new things to learn in LENR.
I wonder what Mills will think of this one?
